How Identity and Perceived Power Shape the Modern Consumer Journey
In marketing, we talk constantly about being “customer-centric.” Far less often do we examine what sits underneath the customer — their identity, their sense of status, and their need to feel recognised.
In the digital era, the megaphone has been democratised. A single individual can now elevate a grievance into a global narrative. What often gets labelled as “entitlement” is more usefully understood as something else: a psychological posture shaped by identity, expectation, and perceived power.
This piece explores how that posture forms, how it expresses itself, and how brands can navigate it with intelligence and empathy.
The Evolution of the “Vocal Advocate”
In traditional marketing, status was gatekept. You bought the Gold Card, and you received the Gold Service.
Digital platforms blurred that hierarchy. Today, the feeling of being “high-status” is no longer conferred by institutions alone — it is claimed, performed, and defended by individuals.
What looks like entitlement is often identity congruence: the feeling that “I am a person of a certain standing; therefore, this brand’s failure is not just an inconvenience, but a misrecognition of who I am.”
When service breaks, it doesn’t just break a transaction. It fractures a self-story.
The Social Psychology of the Ask
Through the lens of Social Identity Theory, high-expectation behaviour is not arrogance — it is defense.
- Perceived Power: In digital environments, consumers feel they hold the ultimate lever: the public review, the viral post, the screenshot.
- Self-Perception: When someone feels their standing is under-recognised, they often over-index on correctness, rules, and escalation as a way to reassert dignity.
The familiar “Karen” archetype is not about temperament — it is about threatened identity.
A Simple Model of Satisfaction
One way to think about satisfaction for status-sensitive audiences is this:
Perceived Satisfaction ≈ Reality − (Expectation + Status Sensitivity)
When reality falls short, the gap is not filled by disappointment alone — it is filled by a need to restore recognition.
This is why purely functional fixes often fail. The problem is not only logistical. It is relational.
From Friction to Escalation
For many consumers, friction looks like this:
Delay → Mild Annoyance → Patience → Resolution
For status-sensitive consumers, the path is different:
Delay → Perceived Disrespect → Identity Threat → Power Reassertion
If the brand response is neutral — “We apologise for the inconvenience” — it can feel like a demotion. Neutrality, in these moments, is experienced as invisibility.
This is where escalation begins.
Designing for Restoration, Not Control
The role of marketing and consumer experience (CX) is not to manage egos. It is to repair relational ruptures.
Three shifts matter:
- Recognition before resolution
“We recognise this isn’t the standard you expect” lands before “We’re fixing the issue.” - Personal ownership over procedural language
“I’m taking responsibility for this” works better than “The system is down.” - Status restoration over generic compensation
Priority handling, upgrades, or exclusive recovery paths feel more meaningful than discounts.
The goal is not appeasement. It is dignity.
The Digital Megaphone
If a status threat is not addressed quickly, the interaction often moves public.
Public escalation is not just about complaint — it is about reclaiming rank. Social validation from peers reinforces the consumer’s self-image as someone who has standards and is right to demand them.
The solution is not suppression. It is redirection.
Moving the interaction to a high-priority private channel gives the consumer a “private stage” where their voice carries weight — without requiring performance.
The Golden Bridge
Handled well, even tense moments can strengthen loyalty.
Immediate acknowledgment lowers threat.
Treating the consumer as an advisor reframes the dynamic.
Restoring status rebuilds trust.
What begins as friction can become advocacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment